The content layer splits the document space into chunks called buckets. This document is about how documents map to buckets and how buckets are distributed and managed. Learn more about the distribution algorithm.
The various operations done through and within the content layer need some unit of data to operate on. This could be documents directly, but then the number of units existing can not be controlled by the content layer. Mapping documents to buckets, the number of units existing can be controlled.
Advantages of many units:
Documents have string identifiers that maps to a 58 bit numeric location. A bucket is defined as all the documents that shares a given amount of least significant bits within the location. The amount of bits used controls how many buckets will exist. For instance, if a bucket contains all documents whose 8 LSB bits is 0x01, the bucket can be split in two by using the 9th bit in the location to split them. Similarly buckets can be joined by requiring one less bit in common.
Distribution happens in several layers.
Document identifiers may use document identifier schemes to control how documents map to locations. This way it is possible to colocate data within buckets by enforcing some documents to have common LSB bits.
See document identifier schemes for how the document identifiers can be user to override location bits. Specifying a group or numeric value with the n and g options overrides the 32 LSB bits of the location. This is useful for streaming search. Unless co-localization is required, it is recommended not to override the location bits, to generate a more even distribution.
When clients talk to the content layer, they typically have a document where a location can be calculated. But in order to know what distributor to talk to, they need to know the correct bucket to use.
Currently this is solved by enforcing a given number of location bits to be used. The cluster state contains a distribution bit count, which is the amount of location bits to use to generate buckets which can be mapped to distributors.
The cluster state may change the number of distribution bits to adjust the number of buckets distributed at this level. When adding more nodes to the cluster, the number of buckets increases in order for the distribution to remain uniform.
Altering the distribution bit count causes a full redistribution of all buckets in the system.
If locations have been overridden to co-localize documents into few units, the distribution of documents into these buckets may be skewed.
Clients need to reach the entire cluster. Keeping a single registry of where to find all buckets would require memory to scale with cluster size. Requiring this registry to fit in memory limits amount of buckets used and complicates creating an even distribution. Keeping a dynamic, large memory structure synchronized across many nodes would also add significant complexity.
An external registry service could be used, but if the registry is large enough to require multiple nodes, then it becomes another stateful service of its own, and client requests would need to do extra network hops to talk to the registry server.
To avoid the problems above, the content layer maps buckets to nodes using an algorithm calculating distributor targets based on bucket and knowledge about what distributors exist, and what their capacities are.
Buckets are mapped to content nodes for storage. As the content nodes store persistent data, moving ownership of buckets take a lot more time at the content node level than on the distributor level. But as each distributor only handles a controllable amount of buckets, they can keep per bucket metadata in memory without creating a scaling issue. Distributors route requests on to content nodes based on an in-memory bucket database, telling it which nodes have replicas of which buckets.
The same algorithm that is used to calculate distributor ownership is used to calculate wanted content node ownership. This implies that there is usually a replica of a bucket on the same content node as the distributor owning the bucket.
The distributor uses this algorithm to calculate where bucket replicas are supposed to be, and move buckets that are currently in the wrong position in the background.
The distributors typically use little system resources, and should not be a bottleneck. It is thus not critical if the distribution to distributors are not as even as distribution of buckets to content nodes. The distributors may split the buckets further than the distribution bit count indicates, allowing more units to be distributed among the content nodes to create a more even distribution, while not affecting routing from client to distributors.
A content node may contain multiple partitions (e.g. disks), enabling it to fail only parts of the node, or easily split requests between multiple resources.
Buckets map to partitions within a content node using the same algorithm that is used to map to nodes. Just that in this case, the distribution keys used are the partition indexes. The seed used includes the distribution key of the node, to ensure the bucket will map to different partitions on other nodes. This is an important property to ensure that when a partition goes down, all partitions on all other nodes will divide the extra load between them.
To avoid a two level distribution with non-ideal movement on state changes, the distributors are aware of the partition states and partition selection algorithm. When mapping buckets to content nodes, it will not map buckets to nodes where the correct partition is not available. By doing this, there is still minimal transfer of buckets on partition state changes, and the node capacities do not need to be altered. The cost is that the remaining partitions on the node will not take over any load from the disk that went down. However, in clusters with many nodes, this should be a small percentage of the partitions.
The content layer defines a set of maintenance operations to keep the cluster balanced. Distributors schedule maintenance operations and issue them to content nodes. Maintenance operations are typically not high priority requests - see priority levels. Scheduling a maintenance operation does not block any external operations.
|Split bucket||Split a bucket in two, by enforcing the documents within the new buckets to have more location bits in common. Buckets are split either because they have grown too big (priority between LOW_2 and LOW3), or because the cluster wants to use more distribution bits (priority LOWEST).|
|Join bucket||Join two buckets into one (priority between NORMAL_6 and LOW_). If a bucket has been previously split due to being large, but documents have now been deleted, the bucket can be joined again.|
|Merge bucket||If there are multiple replicas of a bucket, but they do not store the same information, merge is used to synchronize the replicas. A special case of a merge is a one-way merge, which may be done if some of the replicas are to be deleted right after the merge. Merging is used not only to fix inconsistent bucket replicas (priority NORMAL_2 - NORMAL_3), but also to move buckets between nodes (priority between LOW_1 and LOW_2). To move a bucket, an empty replica is created on the target node, a merge is executed, and the source bucket is deleted. Likewise for copy, minus the bucket delete - buckets are merged with priority NORMAL_3 for redundancy levels.|
|Create bucket||This operation exist merely for the distributor to notify a content node that it is now to store documents for this bucket too. This allows content nodes to refuse operations towards buckets it does not own. The ability to refuse traffic is a safeguard to avoid inconsistencies. If a client talks to a distributor that is no longer working correctly, we rather want its requests to fail than to alter the content cluster in strange ways.|
|Delete bucket||Drop stored state for a bucket and reject further requests for it (priority NORMAL_1)|
|(De)activate bucket||Activate bucket for search results (priority NORMAL_1) - refer to bucket management|
|Expire documents||Documents are expired with priority LOWEST|
The distributors may split existing buckets further to keep bucket sizes at manageable levels, or to ensure more units to split among the backends and their partitions.
Using small buckets, the distribution will be more uniform and bucket operations will be smaller. Using large buckets, less memory is needed for metadata operations and bucket splitting and joining is less frequent.
The size limits may be altered by configuring bucket splitting.
Each document has a document identifier following a document identifier uri scheme. From this scheme a 58 bit numeric location is generated. Typically, all the bits are created from an MD5 checksum of the whole identifier.
MD5 checksums maps document identifiers to random locations. This creates a uniform bucket distribution, and is default. For some use cases, it is better to co-locate documents, optimizing grouped access - an example is personal documents. By enforcing some documents to map to similar locations, these documents are likely to end up in the same actual buckets. There are several use cases for where this may be useful:
n=option is specified, the 32 LSB bits of the given number overrides the 32 LSB bits of the location. If the
g=option is specified, a hash is created of the group name, the hash value is then used as if it were specified with
n=. When the location is calculated, it is mapped to a bucket. Clients map locations to buckets using distribution bits.
Distributors map locations to buckets by searching their bucket database, which is sorted in inverse location order. The common case is that there is one. If there are several, there is currently inconsistent bucket splitting. If there are none, the distributor will create a new bucket for the request if it is a request that may create new data. Typically new buckets are generated split according to the distribution bit count.
Content nodes should rarely need to map documents to buckets, as distributors specify bucket targets for all requests. However, as external operations are not queued during bucket splits and joins, the content nodes remap operations to avoid having to fail them due to a bucket having recently been split or joined.
One basic limitation to the document to location mapping is that it may never change. If it changes, then documents will suddenly be in the wrong buckets in the cluster. This would violate a core invariant in the system, and is not supported.
To allow new functionality, document identifier schemes may be extended or created that maps to location in new ways, but the already existing ones must map the same way as they have always done.
Current document identifier schemes typically allow the 32 least significant bits to be overridden for co-localization, while the remaining 26 bits are reserved for bits created from the MD5 checksum.
When there are enough documents co-localized to the same bucket, causing the bucket to be split, it will typically need to split past the 32 LSB. At this split level and beyond, there is no longer a 1-1 relationship between the node owning the bucket and the nodes its replica data will be stored on.
The effect of this is that documents sharing a location will be spread across nodes in the entire cluster once they reach a certain size. This enables efficient parallel processing.